The High Court has mandated a renewed trial for three individuals accused of bribery and abuse of office offenses. Bharat Jogia, Samuela Dakuitoga, and Ifireimi Savou were originally sentenced on July 12, 2024, after filing appeals against their convictions. Central to their argument was the unavailability of the official transcript of evidence given by prosecution witnesses during their previous trial, which they claimed caused significant prejudice against them.
Justice Thusara Rajasinghe, in a ruling dated July 2, pointed out that the transcript presented by the appellants was not recognized as an official court record, thereby invalidating its use in the previous judgment. The Court determined that the conviction and sentence handed down by the previous magistrate, based on evidence that did not include the necessary transcription, was flawed. Despite the case dating back to 2016 in relation to events from 2015, Justice Rajasinghe emphasized the severity of the allegations and the resulting public interest, leading to the decision to order a retrial before a different magistrate.
This ruling aligns with recent sentiments expressed by the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), which announced plans to appeal a lenient sentence handed down to Jogia, Dakuitoga, and Savou. FICAC’s commitment to addressing corruption in Fiji underscores the importance of rigorous legal standards to enhance public trust in government and law enforcement.
Such developments highlight the judicial system’s ongoing efforts to ensure accountability and uphold the rule of law. A retrial not only provides the accused with a fair opportunity to challenge the evidence against them but also emphasizes the broader integrity of the legal process in Fiji. Observers express hope that these legal proceedings will strengthen ethical governance and foster greater transparency in public office.
Leave a comment