Lawyers from the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) and Sarika Devi Raj, a former finance officer of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), have been granted additional time to address issues concerning necessary disclosures in Raj’s ongoing legal proceedings. This decision was made during a session at the Suva Magistrate’s Court, where Raj sought to modify her bail conditions, specifically requesting the removal of her obligation to regularly report to the FICAC office.

Raj faces serious allegations of fraud, reportedly engaging in actions that resulted in an improper gain of $182,404.99 between September 20, 2019, and June 19, 2020. It’s alleged that she failed to declare her ownership of Maleka Investment, a vendor for the RFMF, which purportedly compromised the rights of the RFMF.

During the court proceedings, Raj’s attorney, Mohammed Saneem, contended that FICAC misled the court regarding the execution of a search warrant and noted that relevant documents requested by the RFMF’s legal director had not been adequately provided. He raised pivotal questions about which authority should take precedence in this case—the RFMF or the court.

In response, FICAC lawyer Lavinia Ravuikadavu denied any allegations of misleading the court, explaining that while FICAC executed the search warrant, they required specific document requests from Saneem, as RFMF has over 150 manuals and instructions. Ravuikadavu confirmed that they communicated this position in a letter sent on December 17, 2024.

Magistrate Pulekeria Low emphasized the importance of FICAC providing all necessary documents, given their role as the charging entity. Saneem has been allowed 14 days to submit a further application for the required documents, after which FICAC will have another 14 days to respond. Both parties are scheduled to return to court on January 23.

This ongoing legal case highlights the intricacies involved in proceedings related to corruption allegations, underscoring the commitment to transparency and due process in Fiji’s judicial system. As the parties work through these challenges, it represents a significant step towards accountability within government functions, fostering a hopeful outlook for justice in Fiji.

In summary, the additional time granted to both parties indicates a continued commitment to ensuring a fair and thorough examination of the issues at hand, which is vital for upholding the rule of law and integrity in public service.