Lawyers representing the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) and Sarika Devi Raj, a former finance officer of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), have been granted additional time to resolve issues related to necessary disclosures in Raj’s ongoing legal case. This decision was reached during a session at the Suva Magistrate’s Court, where Raj sought to modify her bail conditions, specifically the removal of her obligation for regular reporting to the FICAC office.

Raj is facing serious allegations of committing acts leading to an improper gain of $182,404.99 between September 20, 2019, and June 19, 2020. The core of the allegations lies in her failure to declare her ownership of Maleka Investment, a vendor for the RFMF, which is claimed to have harmed the organization’s interests.

During the court proceedings, Raj’s attorney, Mohammed Saneem, argued that FICAC misled the court regarding the execution of a search warrant and noted that not all relevant documents, as directed by the RFMF’s legal director, were adequately provided. He raised important questions about the degree of authority in this case, deliberating whether the court or the RFMF should be the primary entity involved.

In response, FICAC lawyer Lavinia Ravuikadavu denied any accusations of misleading the court. She clarified that while FICAC executed the search warrant, they required precise document requests from Saneem due to RFMF’s possession of over 150 manuals and instructions. Ravuikadavu confirmed that they had communicated these needs to Saneem in a letter dated December 17, 2024.

Magistrate Pulekeria Low highlighted the necessity for FICAC to provide all pertinent documents, given their role in filing charges against Raj. Saneem has been permitted 14 days to submit a further application for the requested documents, following which FICAC will have another 14 days to respond. Both parties are expected to reconvene in court on January 23.

This case underscores the complexities involved in legal proceedings concerning corruption allegations and emphasizes the importance of due process and transparency within Fiji’s judiciary system. As both parties navigate these legal challenges, it represents a significant step toward accountability in government operations, fostering a positive outlook for justice in Fiji.

In summary, the additional time granted indicates a continued commitment to thoroughly examining the issues at hand, which is essential for upholding the rule of law and integrity in public service.