Lawyers representing the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) and Sarika Devi Raj, a former finance officer of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), have been granted additional time to resolve matters pertaining to necessary disclosures in Raj’s ongoing legal case. The decision was made during a recent session at Suva Magistrate’s Court, where Raj sought to modify her bail conditions, specifically aiming to eliminate her requirement for regular reporting to FICAC headquarters.

Raj faces serious allegations involving improper gain of $182,404.99 between September 20, 2019, and June 19, 2020. It is alleged that she failed to declare her status as the sole proprietor of Maleka Investment, a vendor for the RFMF, which purportedly harmed the interests of the military forces.

In court, Raj’s attorney, Mohammed Saneem, contended that FICAC misled the court concerning the execution of a search warrant and that they had not adequately provided certain documents requested by the RFMF’s legal director. Saneem raised critical questions regarding the authority in this case, questioning whether the RFMF or the court should hold precedence.

FICAC lawyer Lavinia Ravuikadavu responded by denying any allegations of misleading the court, clarifying that although FICAC executed the search warrant, they required specific documents requested by Saneem. She stated that RFMF had over 150 manuals and instructions and that they had communicated their needs to Saneem in a letter dated December 17, 2024.

Magistrate Pulekeria Low emphasized the necessity for FICAC to furnish all relevant documents, given their role as the charging entity. Saneem has been granted 14 days to submit a further application for the required documents, after which FICAC will have an additional 14 days to respond. Both parties are scheduled to reconvene in court on January 23.

This case illustrates the significant complexities surrounding legal proceedings related to allegations of corruption, showcasing the commitment to upholding transparency and due process in Fiji’s judicial system. As both parties navigate these challenges, it represents a critical step towards accountability within government operations, fostering optimism for justice. The timely resolution of these matters is essential for reinforcing the rule of law and the integrity of public service in Fiji.