Constitutional Reform: A Path to Inclusive Governance?

Attorney-General Graham Leung recently addressed concerns regarding the procedural aspects of amending the 2013 Constitution, specifically responding to claims made by the Opposition about the suspension of Standing Orders 6(5) and 92. He clarified that the Standing Orders can indeed be overridden by the Constitution in cases of conflict, reaffirming that the government’s actions to present a Bill to amend the Constitution adhere to legal frameworks.

Leung emphasized the government’s commitment to lawful reforms, asserting that the proposed amendments aim to lower barriers for constitutional changes. This aligns with his previous comments regarding the potential pathways for reform, which include seeking an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court to clarify the constitutional amendment provisions.

In discussing the overall objectives, he pointed to the necessity for a Constitution that evolves with societal needs. Leung has consistently highlighted the importance of engaging with public sentiment as the government prepares for a significant legislative year leading up to the anticipated general election in 2026.

Additionally, he warned that the process of amending the Constitution must be approached with caution to prevent unintended consequences that could destabilize existing institutions. The need for a bipartisan approach and public consultation has been a recurring theme in his remarks, indicating an understanding of the complex nature of constitutional law.

Leung’s advocacy for open dialogue and careful deliberation reflects a commitment to inclusive governance, suggesting that a thoughtful approach to constitutional reform could enhance the relationship between the government and its citizens. This could ultimately lead to a stronger alignment between the Constitution and the democratic aspirations of the people, fostering a more responsive governance structure in Fiji.

The conversations surrounding these amendments represent a hopeful indication of a government willing to adapt and reflect the will of its populace, paving the way for a more harmonious and consequential constitutional framework.