Constitutional Dilemmas: Will Change Come Before 2026?

Attorney-General Graham Leung has outlined potential paths for revising the 2013 Constitution, suggesting that the Government may seek an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of its amendment provisions. During a press briefing, Leung emphasized his belief that a constitution should evolve alongside societal changes, stating, “The world doesn’t stand still.”

He acknowledged a growing public desire for change and mentioned the Government’s intention to be receptive to these sentiments. As the year 2025 approaches, which is expected to precede a general election in 2026, Leung noted the challenges ahead as the Government prepares its extensive legislative agenda.

The Attorney-General posed questions about the potential for either comprehensive changes to the Constitution or a more gradual approach involving less contentious amendments. He referred to this process as complicated, noting that it requires careful consideration and a bipartisan approach. Leung explained that the alterations to the Constitution must be undertaken with caution to avoid unintended consequences that could destabilize existing institutions.

Highlighting the importance of collaboration, he expressed the necessity for discussions among political parties and civil society. Leung warned against hasty changes, urging that revisions to the supreme law of the land should be approached with the seriousness they deserve.

Furthermore, he cited the difficulty of garnering sufficient support for constitutional changes, likening it to the challenge of a camel passing through the eye of a needle. He concluded by underscoring the significance of differing viewpoints in a democratic society, welcoming constructive dialogue as a vital component of governance.

This ongoing consideration presents a hopeful opportunity for community engagement and comprehensive reform, reinforcing democratic values and promoting a Constitution that reflects the needs and aspirations of the people. The process may foster collaboration and dialogue among diverse groups, paving the way for a more cohesive future.