Attorney-General Graham Leung has reassured the public that any future review or amendment of the Constitution will strictly follow legal protocols, emphasizing that there is no intent to bypass the Constitution. “There is no intention to do otherwise,” he affirmed, underscoring the government’s commitment to adhering to constitutional norms.
In a recent media briefing, Leung indicated that the government plans to utilize Section 91 of the Constitution to request an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court about certain sections that may conflict with constitutional requirements or could be deemed unconstitutional. “Expert legal advice suggests some parts that complicate amendments may themselves be unconstitutional,” he elaborated.
Leung highlighted the significance of fostering an open, informed, and factual public discourse on potential constitutional changes, free from fear and misinformation. He remarked, “The Amendment Bill is about process and procedure,” ensuring that as long as he holds the position of Attorney-General, he will strive to protect these values.
His statements reflect a broader proactive stance by the government, recognizing the public’s growing desire for change and the importance of considering diverse opinions in the legislative process. With the next general election expected in 2026, there is an increasing urgency for comprehensive legislative action in 2025.
This careful approach aims to maintain institutional stability while addressing the evolving needs of society. Leung’s commitment to a bipartisan method evokes optimism about potential reforms, paving the way for a governance framework that not only respects the Constitution but also resonates with the aspirations of citizens.
In summary, Leung’s emphasis on careful deliberation and genuine public engagement in constitutional matters signals a promising opportunity for progressive governance that embraces democratic values while navigating the complexities of law.
Leave a comment