Paramount Chief of Namosi, Ratu Suliano Matanitobua, has raised significant concerns regarding several outdated laws from the colonial era that no longer serve the iTaukei communities in Fiji. He specifically identified five laws: the Fisheries Act, Policy Act, Transnational River Act, Petroleum Act, and Mining Act, which he claims hinder the rights and traditional authority of the iTaukei people over their land and resources.
Ratu Suliano remarked that these laws were established as far back as the early 20th century for administrative purposes but have since become ineffective in protecting the interests of the indigenous populace. “These laws need to be amended,” he asserted. The chief emphasized that control over essential natural resources has shifted to state agencies, limiting the involvement of traditional landowners and local communities in governance.
He is vocal about his opposition to ocean mining, declaring it a threat to marine ecosystems and traditional fishing grounds. Ratu Suliano stands firm, stating, “We will go against mining in the ocean. That’s my stance. I stand with the people.” While he has decided not to return to politics, his commitment to advocate for indigenous rights continues through his responsibilities in chiefly leadership.
Furthermore, discussions around these legal reforms have gained momentum following the re-establishment of the Great Council of Chiefs (GCC) in 2023, which has been concentrating on legislative changes related to indigenous land ownership and resource rights. This renewed focus reflects a broader movement towards ensuring that the voices of the iTaukei community are effectively represented and that their traditional rights are upheld in contemporary legislation.
It’s hopeful to see proactive measures being discussed by leaders like Ratu Suliano and the GCC, which aim to secure a more just and equitable framework for resource management that respects the heritage and rights of the iTaukei people. Such reforms not only promise to enhance the agency of indigenous communities but could also serve as a model for collaborative governance, advocating for sustainable practices that benefit both the environment and local society.
Leave a comment