Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent expansion of Fiji’s Cabinet from 20 to 22 ministers has sparked significant debate regarding its adherence to the Coalition Agreement established in 2022 among the People’s Alliance, the National Federation Party, and the Social Democratic Liberal Party. This agreement explicitly stipulates a limit on the number of ministers, leading to concerns over potential violations and their impact on coalition stability.

Constitutional lawyer Jon Apted has voiced concerns about the expansion, noting that while the Coalition Agreement is essentially a “gentleman’s agreement” lacking in legal enforceability, it relies on the principles of mutual respect and cooperation among coalition partners. Apted explained that if parties perceive a breach, they may choose to address the issue internally or potentially exit the coalition altogether. Importantly, he clarified that independent Members of Parliament, who were elected under a party’s banner, face no constitutional barriers to serving in a government with other parties.

The Cabinet expansion comes at a critical juncture for Fiji, particularly within the struggling sugarcane sector, where many growers have expressed intentions to leave the industry due to future uncertainties. This backdrop has amplified public calls for greater government accountability and effective responses to pressing socio-economic issues such as climate change and rising living costs.

Public sentiment around this development is divided. Supporters argue that increasing the number of ministers could enhance the government’s ability to effectively address critical national issues, while critics, including former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, warn that such a move may lead to unnecessary bureaucracy, detracting from efforts to tackle essential challenges like poverty and high living expenses.

Despite the controversy, there remains a sense of hope that these changes could result in improved governance. Observers express optimism that as the government adapts its priorities and engages more transparently with citizens, it may strengthen public trust and responsiveness.

In summary, while Prime Minister Rabuka’s decision raises important questions about governance and adherence to coalition agreements, it also presents an opportunity for reform within Fiji’s political landscape. By navigating these new changes thoughtfully, the government could emerge more unified and better equipped to address the diverse challenges facing its citizens, setting a hopeful trajectory for a collaborative future.