In a recent series of letters to the editor, several individuals have voiced their opinions on various topics affecting everyday life in Fiji.
Tai Smith raised a thought-provoking question regarding cinema seating policies, highlighting the lack of clear reasons for prohibiting moviegoers from occupying empty seats when theaters are not maximally filled. In light of the high costs associated with cinema experiences, including tickets and refreshments, some may prefer the comfort of streaming movies at home through platforms like Netflix.
Areki Dawai commented on the presence of numerous police vehicles at a recent event at Laucala, raising concerns about the quick response capabilities of the police during emergencies. Although it was uncommon to see RFMF vehicles at the event, he expressed hope that the police would adequately respond to public calls for assistance without delays in the future.
Meanwhile, Jan Nissar criticized the Fiji Rugby Union’s management for lacking diversity, claiming that the organization persists in predominantly representing one ethnic group, thus stifling any real changes in its structure or player selection.
Lastly, Paul Geraghty responded to Professor Biman Prasad’s statements on climate change and the importance of COP29, humorously questioning whether the tropical temperature limit is measured in Fahrenheit or Centigrade, highlighting the seriousness of addressing global warming.
Overall, these letters reflect a mixture of concerns about societal norms, governance, representation, and environmental issues that resonate with many citizens. While the challenges identified may seem daunting, they also signal an engaged public willing to voice their thoughts and advocate for change. Encouraging open dialogue can pave the way for progress and improvements in various sectors.
Leave a comment