Concerned Fijians are calling for the shutdown of the “ChatFiji Facebook” forum following the death of social influencer Esala Seru Yalewamama, also known as “Ranadi Kei Viti,” who passed away yesterday morning. The forum is known for unregulated content, often hosting defamatory and derogatory posts about individuals. The circumstances surrounding Esala’s death are allegedly linked to the forum, and an investigation is underway, according to Assistant Commissioner of Police – Crime (ACP) Mesake Waqa.
Despite the calls for its closure, social media influencer and lawyer Jon Apted argues that shutting down the forum is not a permanent solution. He believes the toxic culture would only move to another platform. Apted suggests that the solution lies in education, effective handling of complaints, and prosecuting serious offenders. He emphasizes the need for a responsible online culture and urges people to report offensive posts.
Apted also states that many people misunderstand freedom of speech, thinking it allows them to say anything online without consequences. He stresses that freedom of speech is not an absolute right and that it does not extend to harmful personal attacks. He calls on the Fiji Human Rights, the Anti-Discrimination Commission, and the Online Safety Commission to educate the public on the limits of freedom of speech. He also suggests that the government should increase resources for the Commission to tackle cyberbullying more effectively.
The Fiji Women’s Rights Movement has condemned the repeated acts of online psychological violence and character attacks. Executive director Nalini Singh urges authorities to focus more on monitoring online violence. She condemns ongoing hateful remarks, even after Esala’s death, and calls for justice against cyberbullying and online harassment.
The Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission echoes similar concerns. Chairperson Pravesh Sharma criticizes the lack of moderation on public chat forums and believes administrators and commenters should face legal consequences. Sharma stresses that freedom of speech comes with responsibilities and limitations, as outlined in the 2013 Constitution, which protects individuals from hate speech and discrimination. The Constitution emphasizes equal protection and treatment under the law for all individuals, regardless of their personal characteristics or beliefs.