Calls for Stronger Accountability: Controversy Over Fiji’s Transparency Commission Bill

Former Member of Parliament Niko Nawaikula has expressed significant apprehensions regarding the government’s proposed Transparency Commission Bill, suggesting it does not align with constitutional standards. He stated that although the Bill empowers the commission to investigate conduct breaches, it is deficient in enforcing the removal of officials who are guilty of misconduct, a power he argues is mandated by the Constitution.

Nawaikula urged for amendments to Section 79 of the Bill to grant the commission the authority to take decisive actions rather than merely issue recommendations. He raised additional concerns about the Code of Conduct Bill, recommending the consolidation of its schedules for officials to simplify its effectiveness. He proposed a new clause mandating the return of significant gifts to the community, barring food items, to reduce potential conflicts of interest.

Moreover, Nawaikula highlighted the lack of penalties for non-compliance within Section 8 of the Code of Conduct Bill, emphasizing that without clear consequences, the Bill could fail to hold officials accountable. He called for stronger language to ensure compliance, aiming for a more robust accountability framework.

Opposition MP Jone Usamate further questioned the scope and authority of the Accountability Transparency Commission, expressing uncertainty about its power over Parliament, which has established self-regulation mechanisms. He compared this situation to the judiciary’s oversight by the Judicial Services Commission, raising the question of how the new commission’s role would coexist with existing structures.

While there are concerns about the potential overlap of responsibilities between the Transparency Commission and existing bodies, Nawaikula defended the necessity of creating this commission, viewing it as a constitutional obligation lawmakers must address. The ongoing discussions reflect a broader push towards enhanced governance and accountability in Fiji, with hopes that the proposed changes will eventually foster greater public trust in government institutions.

In light of recent legislative efforts, including previous discussions on improving ethical conduct standards for public officials, there is cautious optimism that the proposed amendments can lead to more transparent and effective governance, reinforcing public confidence in Fiji’s political landscape.