Fiji Labour Party leader Mahendra Chaudhry has called on Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka and the Attorney General to initiate constitutional processes aimed at reforming key institutions within the country’s justice system. Chaudhry’s remarks address ongoing controversies surrounding the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP), the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), and the Ministry of Justice, which he describes as steeped in “disgraceful drama.”

Chaudhry pointed out that the issues at the ODPP have escalated over the past year, starting with the controversial appointment of John Rabuku as acting DPP in October 2023. A Supreme Court ruling later deemed this appointment unlawful due to Rabuku’s previous conviction for professional misconduct. The leader emphasized that the JSC should have intervened to prevent Rabuku from continuing in his role, which Chaudhry argues has allowed misconduct to thrive within the ODPP.

The situation has further degraded through reported incidents of unprofessional behavior by Rabuku and another official, Nancy Tokoisuva, following the DPP’s conference, which tarnished the office’s reputation. Chaudhry believes there is an intentional obstruction to Christopher Pryde’s reinstatement as DPP, asserting that “this rot has insidiously infiltrated other institutions.”

The ongoing drama is not an isolated incident; it follows a broader pattern of governance challenges that Fiji has been facing. Similar concerns have been raised about the handling of allegations involving Pryde and the juxtaposed actions of Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga, particularly regarding his decision to place Fiji Corrections Service Commissioner Jalesi Nakarawa on leave. Critics, including Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu, demand equal scrutiny for all involved officials in this complex web of political and ethical dilemmas.

This moment in Fiji’s governance presents an opportunity for substantial reform. If the government acts decisively to address these issues, it could restore public confidence and trust in its institutions. By prioritizing accountability and transparency, the Rabuka administration could not only rectify current missteps but also forge a more robust framework for ethical governance, ultimately benefiting the citizens of Fiji.

In summary, Chaudhry’s pressing appeal signifies a crucial juncture for Fiji’s governance, where decisive actions may lead to significant improvements in public trust and institutional integrity. The hope remains that with adequate reform, the justice system can serve the public better and uphold the rule of law effectively.