Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent decision to expand Fiji’s Cabinet to 22 ministers has garnered significant attention, with experts questioning its alignment with the Coalition Agreement established in 2022 among the People’s Alliance, National Federation Party, and Social Democratic Liberal Party. This agreement clearly sets a limit of 20 ministers, raising concerns about the potential violation and implications for coalition stability.

Constitutional lawyer Jon Apted has articulated that while the Coalition Agreement is essentially a “gentleman’s agreement” without legal enforceability, it relies heavily on principles of mutual respect and cooperation among coalition partners. He pointed out that any party believing that there has been a breach could resolve the issue internally or choose to exit the agreement altogether. Notably, Apted clarified that there are no constitutional limitations preventing independent Members of Parliament who were previously elected under a party ticket from serving as ministers in a coalition government.

The announcement of the new Cabinet comes at a critical time for Fiji, particularly within the struggling sugarcane sector, where many growers have indicated plans to leave the industry due to uncertainties about the future. This context has intensified public calls for greater government accountability and effectiveness, especially in addressing pressing socio-economic issues such as climate change and rising living costs.

Responses to the Cabinet expansion have been varied. Supporters assert that increasing the number of ministers may enhance the government’s capability to address urgent issues more effectively. In contrast, critics, including former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, caution that such a move could introduce unnecessary bureaucracy that distracts from tackling fundamental challenges like poverty and high living expenses.

Despite these controversies, there is a sense of hope among observers that the changes could lead to improved governance. Many express optimism that as the government is compelled to reassess its priorities, it may cultivate greater transparency and responsiveness towards the needs of Fijians.

In summary, while Prime Minister Rabuka’s decision raises crucial questions about adherence to coalition agreements and governance effectiveness, it also represents a significant opportunity for reform in Fiji’s political landscape. By navigating these changes thoughtfully, the government might be better equipped to face the diverse challenges facing its citizens, paving the way for a brighter and more collaborative future.