Former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama has initiated legal proceedings against the Government and the Attorney-General, alleging that they have not fulfilled their obligations regarding his complete pension and gratuity payments. The case was brought forward by Bainimarama’s attorney, Fatima Gul, in Suva’s High Court.
Bainimarama, who held office from 2009 to 2022, asserts that he is due 75 percent of his annual salary as pension along with a gratuity payment. He claims this equates to $246,562.50 based on his annual salary of $328,750, while the Government has reportedly lowered this figure to $184,921.87. Additionally, Bainimarama estimates that he is owed a one-time gratuity of $770,507.87, but claims the Government has only disbursed $433,296.75, resulting in a deficit of $337,211.12.
His legal counsel has requested several forms of relief including:
– Payment of the remaining gratuity balance of $337,211.12.
– Appropriate pension payments of $7,112.37 every two weeks.
– Entitlements as specified under Section 9 of the Prime Ministers Pension Act 1994.
– Pension and retirement allowances according to the Parliamentary Remuneration Act.
– Prejudgment interest at an annual rate of 13.5 percent, along with post-judgment interest until full payment is made.
– Full coverage of legal costs.
In response, the Government refutes these claims, stating that Bainimarama’s entitlements have been accurately dispensed in accordance with the Prime Ministers Pension Act. They maintain that he should receive 80 percent of his salary, which they calculate at $263,000, asserting that all benefits owed have been provided.
The court has instructed Bainimarama to submit additional filings by November 19, with the Government expected to reply by December 3. A pre-trial conference is scheduled for January 7, 2025, followed by an adjournment to February 5, 2025. Should either party fail to adhere to court directives, they may incur a fine of $2000.
This case highlights the complexities involved in pension management and the importance of clarity in governmental financial obligations to former leaders. With the upcoming court dates, it is a moment for both the plaintiff and the government to present their sides, ensuring justice and transparency in the resolution of this matter. There’s hope that a fair agreement can be reached, fostering a sense of stability for all parties involved.
Leave a comment