Bainimarama and Qiliho’s Absence Raises Questions at Fiji’s Military Reconciliation Ceremony

Former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama and convicted former Commissioner of Police Sitiveni Qiliho did not receive any formal request allowing them to attend the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF) Reconciliation and Restoration programme held last Saturday. Fiji Corrections Service Commissioner Jalesi Nakarawa confirmed that he was unaware of any request for their release.

During the reconciliation ceremony, which took place at the Queen Elizabeth Barracks in Suva, Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka expressed his desire for both individuals to participate in the event. He acknowledged the significance of the ceremony, especially in light of its association with the November 2, 2000 mutiny, and sought forgiveness from those affected by the events of that day.

Despite Mr. Rabuka’s request for Bainimarama and Qiliho to be present, they ultimately did not attend the programme. In his remarks, Mr. Rabuka expressed remorse and asked for understanding regarding the past actions of both men, emphasizing the need for patience as they work toward reconciliation.

The Fiji Corrections Service operates under the Corrections Service Act of 2006, which allows for short-term releases under specific circumstances, such as attending community events or rehabilitation efforts. However, for a release to occur, a formal notification is required, which was reportedly not submitted in this case.

This reconciliation effort highlights the ongoing journey toward healing and understanding within the community. It illustrates the complexities involved in moving past historical grievances, a challenge that many societies face. While the absence of Bainimarama and Qiliho from the ceremony is notable, the commitment to reconciliation shown by Mr. Rabuka and others may pave the way for future discussions and healing in Fiji.

Overall, while the situation is somewhat disappointing, it also indicates a willingness among leaders to confront the past and seek ways to unify the community. This commitment to dialogue can serve as a foundation for progress and collective healing in the nation.