Former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama and former Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho have received the court’s approval to appeal their convictions in a full court hearing. The decision was conveyed to both the State Prosecution and the defense lawyers during a session held yesterday morning.
The appeal seeks to challenge their convictions based on several legal grounds, including the alleged misapplication of the Brown v. Dunn rule and issues surrounding the interpretation of specific sections of the Sentencing and Penalties Act. Additionally, Bainimarama and Qiliho have raised concerns regarding Chief Justice Salesi Temo’s refusal to recuse himself from their case.
The court indicated its willingness to entertain these questions in the hope of addressing why there was a lack of response when the original application was tendered to the High Court. Lawyers Devanesh Sharma and Fatima Gul, representing the defendants, have requested that the case be scheduled for a full court hearing during the session in July.
This appeal is particularly significant as it opens the way for a comprehensive review of the initial judicial proceedings concerning their convictions. The ongoing legal maneuvers not only center on the defendants’ rights but also highlight the commitment of Fiji’s judicial system to uphold the rule of law and ensure accountability among high-ranking officials. Public interest in the case remains high, reflecting the broader implications this ruling may have on the political landscape in Fiji.
With the upcoming hearing, there is a renewed hope for justice and fair treatment under the law, illustrating the resilience of the judicial process even in tumultuous times.
Leave a comment