Australia’s recently announced climate target has faced criticism from Pacific climate advocates, who argue that the target threatens regional survival and undermines Australia’s bid to co-host COP31 with Pacific nations. The Albanese government’s updated Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges a 62–70% emissions reduction by 2035. Critics note it falls short of the 75% reduction scientists claim is necessary to limit global warming to 1.5°C and also lacks a commitment to phasing out fossil fuels.
Fenton Lutunatabua, Deputy Head of Regions at 350.org, remarked that anything less than a 75% reduction this decade lacking a fossil fuel phase-out is not a viable climate plan, but rather a denial of climate justice. Pacfic climate activists warn that the Pacific is already experiencing the detrimental effects of every fraction of a temperature increase, calling the newly proposed “sweet spot” alarmingly out of touch.
The announcement coincided with an alarming national climate risk assessment that warned of escalating threats if the 1.5°C threshold is surpassed, and faced backlash over the government’s choice to extend the North West Shelf gas project until 2070. Jacynta Fa’amau, another campaigner from 350.org, emphasized that Australia missed the chance to establish a legacy as a true climate leader, endangering both regional and national interests through inaction.
Shani Tager, Senior Campaigner at 350.org Australia, called the proposed target a betrayal of both scientific consensus and the public, accusing the government of succumbing to fossil fuel interests and escalating the risks of fires, heatwaves, and unlivable conditions. These critiques echo previous concerns from Pacific leaders over Australia’s decision to extend the gas project, describing it as a significant challenge to international climate commitments and regional climate agreements.
The ongoing protests from Pacific leaders against Australia’s climate strategies highlight the tensions in the region, as Australia seeks to position itself as a climate leader. Despite financial contributions like Australia’s pledged $100 million to the Pacific Resilience Facility, critics argue that the approval of new fossil fuel projects contradicts genuine climate leadership and exacerbates recovery efforts. As Australia aims to co-host COP31 in 2026, regional leaders continue urging Australia to adopt more ambitious climate measures and align its policies with broader Pacific objectives.
This situation presents a critical moment for Australia, where its actions have broad ramifications for international climate dialogues and its reputation as a climate leader. By focusing on renewable energy initiatives and addressing Pacific nations’ concerns, Australia stands a chance to demonstrate meaningful leadership in combating climate change, fostering cooperative relations, and promoting a sustainable future for the entire region.
Leave a comment