Attorney-General Graham Leung has strongly rejected accusations of meddling in the Commission of Inquiry (COI) related to the appointment of FICAC Commissioner Barbara Malimali. Recently, the Fiji Labour Party (FLP) issued a statement demanding Ms. Malimali’s ousting, alleging that Mr. Leung sought to obstruct the inquiry.
In a rebuttal, Mr. Leung’s office clarified that he had appeared as a witness before the COI on January 16, emphasizing his commitment to the commission’s independence and mandate. “The allegations that he tried to stop the work of the Commission of Inquiry are false,” his official statement asserted. Furthermore, he acknowledged the importance of the commission’s terms of reference and underscored that he supports its work.
The inquiry’s recent proceedings have been fraught with controversy, particularly following the dismissal of a significant witness by Ms. Malimali, which has intensified calls for her removal from the position.
This situation highlights a critical moment in the transparency and accountability of public office appointments in Fiji. The attention brought to the inquiry may serve as an important reminder of the necessity for due process in governance. Continued scrutiny of this process may ultimately lead to improved oversight, ensuring that public roles are filled with integrity.
Summary: Attorney-General Graham Leung has denied allegations from the Fiji Labour Party regarding interference in the Commission of Inquiry into FICAC Commissioner Barbara Malimali’s appointment. He underscored the importance of the commission’s independence and indicated his commitment to supporting its mandate. The controversy surrounding a key witness’s dismissal has intensified calls for Malimali’s removal.
Leave a comment