Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has refuted claims that a conversation he had with suspended Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Christopher Pryde was in any way related to the ongoing investigation into him by the Criminal Investigations Department.
During the first day of Pryde’s tribunal hearing at the Court of Appeal in Veiuto, Suva, Sayed-Khaiyum clarified that their discussion was purely personal, focusing on their children and families. This conversation occurred at a diplomatic function on February 28, 2023, coinciding with the time when the Criminal Investigation Department was actively investigating Sayed-Khaiyum, with the case file already submitted to the DPP’s office.
Pryde is currently on suspension with full pay after being ordered to appear before a tribunal by then-President Ratu Wiliame Katonivere in April 2023 due to alleged misbehavior. He has stated that he will not attend the tribunal until his salary is reinstated.
Sayed-Khaiyum, taking the stand, noted that he had engaged in conversations with several notable figures, including diplomats and government officials, during the same event. He criticized the evidence presented by Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga, stating that the isolated photo of him and Pryde was misleading and failed to capture the presence of other attendees. While he could not recall the exact duration of his discussion with Pryde, he firmly maintained that there was no discussion concerning his ongoing investigation.
When questioned about a separate allegation regarding a monthly superannuation payment of US$1000 to the suspended DPP without proper approval, Sayed-Khaiyum asserted it was an issue for the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) to investigate, emphasizing that he played a minimal role in the remuneration process.
In response to questioning, he stated he was not fully aware of all payments made to constitutional office holders, including Pryde. Moreover, he suggested that any inquiries or information on such payments should be directed toward the records held by the JSC.
Minister Turaga, who also testified at the tribunal, described the exchange between Sayed-Khaiyum and Pryde as “unbecoming and unethical,” citing the sensitive nature of the ongoing investigation at the time and the prior professional relationship between the two. He noted that Pryde admitted to exercising poor judgment, later writing an apology letter.
The tribunal hearing has been adjourned until the following day.
This situation highlights the complex interplay of personal and professional relationships in the legal sphere, placing a spotlight on the importance of transparency and ethical conduct among public officials. As the tribunal continues, it is hoped that it will lead to a deeper understanding of the established protocols and ensure accountability in the justice system, fostering a climate of integrity and trust.
In summary, the case reflects not only the particular circumstances surrounding these individuals but also serves as a reminder of the need for ethical boundaries and clarity in communication between public servants, especially when investigations are underway.
Leave a comment