Fiji has been experiencing a phenomenon described as a ‘culture of convenience.’ Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu pointed out that this trend fosters a temptation for individuals and groups to take shortcuts for personal and political gain. His comments were made in response to the findings of the Government’s National Security and Defence Review (NSDR), which revealed a significant lack of trust in the Fiji Police Force and the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF).
Seruiratu emphasized the importance of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as a crucial opportunity for the RFMF to disclose the circumstances surrounding previous coups. He noted that it is vital for those involved in past political upheavals to be permitted to share their narratives. This includes individuals recently released for their roles in the 2000 events, as well as military members from the Queen Elizabeth and Sukanaivalu Barracks who were imprisoned due to the coups. He also underscored the need to consider the events of 1987 in this context, asserting that only through truth can the nation find freedom.
Reflecting on his background as a former RFMF officer, Seruiratu warned against neglecting the truth, comparing it to merely sweeping cobwebs while the spider remains unchecked.
Regarding the review of the 2013 Constitution, Seruiratu stated that discussions should take place only after the TRC process is completed in a sincere and transparent manner. He argued that Fiji’s underlying issues stem not from the Constitution itself, but rather from individuals or groups who feel disillusioned by the democratic process and resort to coups to fulfill their political ambitions.
He illustrated this point by recalling how the 1970 Constitution was amended following the 1987 coups and how the 1997 Constitution was replaced after the events of 2000 and 2006. Both new constitutions included provisions for immunity to shield those responsible for these disruptions from legal consequences.
Seruiratu concluded by calling for strong leadership and a genuine commitment from all sectors of society, including political figures, community leaders, chiefs, religious authorities, and business representatives, emphasizing that the interests of the people should be central to these processes.
Leave a comment