A former employee of the defunct Peoples Community Network (PCN), Savu Tawake, has defended the organization’s handling of finances related to the Lagilagi Housing project. Tawake, who was terminated from his position in 2019 for financial mismanagement, maintains that all transactions were properly documented and transparently executed.
In an interview this week, Tawake criticized the previous government’s interference, asserting that a lack of transparency in the project’s implementation led to significant delays. Families in the nearby Jittu Estate squatter settlement have faced ongoing hardships as a result. Jittu Estate, a state-owned land, is the largest informal settlement in Suva, housing over 3,000 residents.
Parveen Bala, the former Minister for Housing, has not replied to requests for comment regarding his alleged influence over the project. The Public Rental Board (PRB), which has succeeded PCN following its deregistration, has yet to clarify whether families living in the Jittu settlement will be prioritized for the planned 36 new housing units, with construction expected to kick off next month.
The complications surrounding the Lagilagi project were exacerbated by funding delays from the government, which led to unfinished units despite public payments made for them. The project’s completion was also hampered by criticisms of the past government from the late Father Kevin Barr, an influential figure in PCN’s formation.
Tawake pointed out that funds for the organization were deposited into two separate accounts and every transaction was documented. He indicated that he has provided all necessary information to both police and the Fiji Competition and Consumer Commission regarding the allegations against PCN.
Unit occupants could either pay a lump sum for ownership or opt for a rental payment plan. There is hope that the government might reinstate the project back to PCN, aiming to fulfill its original goal of assisting those in Jittu.
Residents like Sireli Naqau express optimism about potentially moving into the new units, but the uncertainty surrounding affordability and prioritization looms. Reports suggest that those in stable employment among the squatters may get first dibs on the new units, raising questions about the future for families who might struggle to meet rental costs.
The Lagilagi Housing project, seen as a pilot initiative, had the potential to significantly alleviate housing issues for those in informal settlements, had it been executed more effectively. Former PCN leaders note that the project’s premature abandonment reflects broader issues within housing initiatives in the region.
This situation encapsulates the need for consistent and reliable management in housing projects to ensure vulnerable communities are adequately supported, with a collaborative effort from both non-governmental organizations and the government being vital for future success.
In summary, while the Lagilagi Housing project faced numerous challenges, there remains a hope that the ongoing efforts will lead to progress. This could ultimately bring about a much-needed improvement in living conditions for families in the affected squatter settlements. The community’s resilience and willingness to participate in the housing discussions suggest a potential path towards betterment for those in need.
Leave a comment