The University of the South Pacific (USP) has turned to the courts to request a stop to further strike actions by its staff unions, namely the Association of the University of the South Pacific Staff (AUSPS) and the University of the South Pacific Staff Union (USPSU). This request comes in light of ongoing tensions surrounding the university’s leadership, particularly the vice-chancellor, Professor Pal Ahluwalia.
On October 18, 2024, some members of the unions initiated a strike, which lasted for a week, resulting in their return to work on October 25, 2024. However, the unions have warned that they remain ready to strike again if their demands are not addressed. The primary demand centers on the removal of Professor Ahluwalia, although the unions have also called for the reinstatement of Dr. Tamara Osborne-Naikatini, a biology lecturer and union president, who was dismissed after sharing confidential details about the vice-chancellor’s contract renewal review during an interview.
During a court hearing, lawyer Wylie Clarke argued for an injunction against any further strike actions, emphasizing the potential disruption to students’ examinations that a continuation of the strikes could cause. He asserted that any future strike threats would exceed the legal mandates provided by the strike ballots.
Conversely, union lawyer Siddarth Nandan contended that any action taken by the unions would comply with the law and described the university’s concerns about examination disruptions as overstated. Justice Chaitanya Lakshman acknowledged the complexities of the situation, highlighting the need for all parties to demonstrate reasonableness in their conduct.
The court has granted Nandan 14 days to submit his argument, with Clarke allowed to respond in seven days. The case is expected to be revisited on November 21.
This dispute highlights the critical issues surrounding academic governance and the importance of effective communication within educational institutions. It underscores a broader theme of worker rights and the necessity for institutions to facilitate dialogue in addressing grievances.
As the parties prepare for the next court session, optimistic resolutions to these tensions could ensure not only a more cohesive working environment but also protect the academic experience of students at the university. Collaboration and understanding from both sides could lead to a more harmonious resolution that respects the rights of staff while ensuring minimal disruption to students’ education.
Leave a comment