The University of the South Pacific has turned to the courts for help in preventing any further strike actions as its unions push for the removal of Vice-Chancellor Professor Pal Ahluwalia. The two unions, the Association of the University of the South Pacific Staff (AUSPS) and the University of the South Pacific Staff Union (USPSU), initiated a strike on October 18, 2024. Although only some members participated, they returned to work a week later but warned that they could strike again if their demands are not addressed.
During a court session, attorney Wylie Clarke requested an injunction to prevent any further strikes, especially during the examination period, citing concerns over disruptions to students’ studies. He pointed out that the strike mandates focused solely on the removal of Professor Ahluwalia; however, the unions are also advocating for the reinstatement of Dr. Tamara Osborne-Naikatini, a biology lecturer and AUSPS president, who was dismissed after revealing confidential details about the vice-chancellor’s contract review in an interview.
Clarke maintained that any future strike would exceed the legal boundaries set by the strike ballots. On the opposing side, lawyer Siddarth Nandan argued that the unions’ actions are lawful, claiming that the University’s concerns about disruptions are overstated. He emphasized that an injunction to prevent a strike can only be applied if it involves essential services and serves the public interest.
Justice Chaitanya Lakshman advised that all parties should act reasonably, as all rights come with certain limitations and responsibilities. The next court proceedings are scheduled for November 21, allowing both parties to prepare their submissions.
This situation at the University reflects the ongoing struggle between faculty members and administration, emphasizing critical issues concerning governance and academic freedom. As discussions continue, there remains hope that a resolution can be reached that balances the university’s operational needs with the legitimate concerns of its staff. Open dialogue between both sides may lead to a more cooperative and harmonious environment that benefits students and faculty alike.
Leave a comment