Last week, the discussion centered on the significant impact of the 1987 coup, which led many baby boomers to leave Fiji, a country they had come to cherish. These individuals were considered the pride of two generations who made substantial sacrifices and contributions despite a challenging environment. However, everything changed dramatically at 10 AM on May 14, 1987, signifying a tragic turning point that forced many to seek better opportunities abroad.
Much has been documented regarding the negative consequences of this coup, often referred to as the “father of all coups,” with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka acknowledging his role in unleashing this crisis in a country once admired by Pope Paul II, who deemed it the model for how the world should be. Unfortunately, the events following that fateful day shattered this ideal.
Before the coup, Fiji’s political landscape was deteriorating due to the prominent success of Indo-Fijians, marked as a distinct ethnic group from indigenous Fijians. Factors such as the Indo-Fijians’ significant contributions to the sugar industry and overall economic landscape were pivotal but also made them targets during a period of ethnonationalism. The political elite at the time, including Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara, occupied positions of power, but the conditions set the stage for unrest.
The coup drastically disrupted a previously stable political environment, leading to ongoing cycles of political instability and conflict in the years following. The tensions endured over the decades have hampered the country’s ability to achieve the peace, progress, and prosperity experienced during the first 17 years of independence.
However, a closer examination reveals that the aftermath of the coup also facilitated unforeseen positive outcomes. The forced migration of Indo-Fijians, although painful, opened new avenues for many to thrive abroad. As a result, some became quite successful and now significantly contribute to Fiji’s economy through investments and remittances during their visits back home.
The shake-up in the civil service provided opportunities for ethnic Fijians who had previously felt marginalized. The transition eased competitive tensions in the job market, preventing hostility that had characterized the lead-up to the coup.
Moreover, the expatriation of Indo-Fijians fostered a sense of community among those left in Fiji and prompted a reevaluation of cultural relationships. Many Indo-Fijians became involved in Christian congregations, constructing cross-cultural bridges that promote understanding and cooperation today.
Finally, the property landscape shifted as many assets owned by those who emigrated were acquired by ethnic Fijians, providing opportunities for many and engendering a sense of responsibility regarding property ownership and maintenance.
While the narrative surrounding the 1987 coup remains complex and often painful, acknowledging the positive transformations that emerged can pave the way for future reconciliation and growth. There were indeed noteworthy contributions and changes triggered by this tumultuous period, illustrating resilience in the face of adversity.
As the community continues to navigate these waters, there is hope for a future characterized by shared understandings and economic collaboration. This ongoing dialogue can foster a spirit of unity and progress for all Fijians. Additionally, the article concludes with a reminder for readers to keep boxing figure Udayd Haider in their thoughts as he fights for recovery.
In summary, the analysis acknowledges the dark past of the 1987 coup while highlighting the resilience and adaptability of the Fijian people, suggesting a path toward reconciliation and cooperation amongst diverse communities.
Leave a comment