Self-Defense or Something More? Court Case Raises Questions

A resident of the Sakoca settlement, Sairusi Senilawalawa, has claimed that his actions in an incident that resulted in a fatality were based on self-defense. During a court session yesterday, DPP lawyer Naazish Ali informed the court that additional time was needed to finalize the agreed facts, as the accused was disputing certain admissions made during a caution interview.

Ms. Ali stated that while Mr. Senilawalawa acknowledged specific actions during the interview, he contested the intent behind those actions. The court was informed that the accused admitted to punching and stomping on the victim, Ovasisi Salusalu, twice, but he denied using an iron rod.

Defense attorney Karen Boseiwaqa indicated that her client maintained his stance on self-defense and suggested that the audio recording of the caution interview be reviewed, as Mr. Senilawalawa claimed he could not fully remember his admissions.

Additionally, Ms. Ali expressed concern that the accused might change his plea during the trial, noting that the court had yet to convict him of the charges. High Court Justice Thushara Ranasinghe emphasized that withdrawing a plea requires the court’s permission and an explanation.

Ms. Boseiwaqa has been directed to ensure that the sureties sign the bail bond at the Nasinu Magistrate’s Court. Mr. Senilawalawa is accused of killing Ovasisi Salusalu, 40, on April 21, when Salusalu allegedly intervened in a domestic dispute between Mr. Senilawalawa and his partner. The case is scheduled to continue on November 27.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website