Samoa’s Parliament approved a significant constitutional amendment aimed at unifying the country’s court structure, amidst a contentious interpretation of the two-thirds majority required for the vote. The amendment, which has stirred debates about its legitimacy, saw 36 Members of Parliament (MPs) in favor and 16 against, with the Speaker, Papalii Lio Masipau, casting a decisive vote based on legal interpretation from the Attorney General.
While the two-thirds majority for the 53-member Parliament was calculated to be approximately 35.33 but rounded down to 35 by the Speaker, this has raised questions that might lead to judicial review regarding how to interpret such majority votes in the future.
Interestingly, the MP for Sagaga No.2, Maulolo Tavita Amosa, was the only member from the opposition to support the amendment, a decision influenced by ongoing land disputes affecting his constituency. Following his vote, tensions within the Parliament escalated, leading him to exit amidst unflattering remarks from his colleagues.
This move is paralleled by recent events in Fiji where Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka is similarly grappling with constitutional amendments, facing challenges in achieving the three-quarters majority required to pass any changes. Both situations reflect a broader struggle in Pacific governments to navigate constitutional reforms that resonate with their diverse cultures and political landscapes.
The developments in Samoa, while contentious, offer an opportunity for a re-examination of legislative procedures and greater scrutiny of the powers held by Parliament. There is hope that these conflicts will lead to robust discussions that can enhance governance and citizen participation in both Samoa and Fiji, promoting democratic principles within the frameworks of their constitutions.
Leave a comment