The Fijian Teachers Association (FTA) president, Netani Druavesi, has ignited a fierce debate by advocating for the reintroduction of corporal punishment in schools. This controversial proposal has drawn sharp criticism from various sectors of the community, highlighting concerns about the implications for children’s well-being. Nilesh Lal, executive director of Dialogue Fiji, expressed serious reservations, asserting that such a stance reflects a disturbing regression in societal values.
Lal described corporal punishment as a form of child abuse and pointed out that sending a child from a loving home into a school environment where they could be physically punished is both shocking and unacceptable. He emphasized that research indicates corporal punishment is ineffective, as it can normalize aggression and lead to increased antisocial behavior, defiance, and negative academic performance in a fear-based learning environment.
The executive director also noted the broader implications of corporal punishment, stating that it can contribute to mental health issues, substance abuse, and difficulties in interpersonal relationships later in life. Instead, he advocated for constructive, non-punitive disciplinary methods, which have been shown to yield better behavioral and educational outcomes.
Statistics reveal grim realities about child safety in Fiji, with five out of six children reported to experience abuse or neglect, alongside 324 cases of child sexual abuse reported by the Fiji Police Force in the first half of this year. This alarming situation intensifies the outcry against returning to corporal punishment as an acceptable practice in schools.
Pravesh Sharma, chairperson of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission, echoed concerns about such a move, asserting that it would violate children’s rights to a safe and supportive education. He emphasized that corporal punishment is unconstitutional and unlawful, highlighting Fiji’s commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which mandates the protection of children from violence and abuse.
In the face of this debate, it’s essential to champion discussions around alternative disciplinary approaches that prioritize emotional and psychological well-being for children in educational environments. Advocating for compassionate, understanding methods can pave the way toward a more nurturing society where children can thrive academically and emotionally, ultimately fostering a future generation that is better equipped to contribute positively to their communities.
In summary, the push for corporal punishment has incited widespread backlash, underscoring a collective commitment to protecting children’s rights and promoting non-violent disciplinary practices in Fiji’s education system.
Leave a comment