Last week, attention was drawn to the 1987 coup in Fiji, which forced many baby boomers to leave their beloved homeland. These individuals, who had worked tirelessly through challenging times, found their aspirations abruptly shattered at 10 AM on May 14, 1987. This event marked the beginning of a new chapter of displacement for many.
While much has been discussed regarding the negative impacts of the coup, which Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has now taken full responsibility for, it’s worth exploring some of the positive outcomes that emerged in the aftermath of this tumultuous time.
Before the coup, Fiji’s political landscape was strained due to the growing success and visibility of Indo-Fijians, separate from the indigenous Fijian population. Indo-Fijians played a significant role in the economy, particularly in the sugar industry, leading to a precarious political environment. The coup disrupted this established order in a manner that has had lasting effects on the country’s governance and economic stability.
However, the coup also birthed a new set of realities that some have framed positively. The forced emigration of Indo-Fijians created opportunities abroad, leading many to substantial success and allowing them to contribute significantly to Fiji’s economy through investments and remittances. The influx of wealth from these individuals, who often return as tourists with emotional connections to their birthplace, has also proven beneficial.
There were also shifts within the civil service, as the departure of many Indo-Fijians opened space for ethnic Fijians, which helped ease inter-ethnic tensions. Although this transition was not without its complications, it altered the landscape of civil service employment.
Furthermore, the realisation that life existed beyond Fiji allowed many Indo-Fijians to explore new opportunities. The demands of these communities have largely centered on political stability, rather than seeking entitlements, fostering a desire for a more unified and peaceful political climate.
Importantly, the 1987 coup prompted a reevaluation of cross-cultural relationships. The adversity faced by Indo-Fijians clarified notions of true friendship and collaboration among different ethnic communities, laying a foundation for stronger social bonds.
Despite the harsh realities of the coup, it catalyzed a series of developments that have reshaped Fiji’s social and economic fabric. Observers might conclude that while the past is fraught with challenges, a hopeful narrative of resilience and growth is possible, as citizens continue to navigate the complexities of their shared identity amidst adversity.
In a further note, concerns remain as boxing champion Udayd Haider remains in a coma, prompting calls for prayers and support for him and his family during this difficult time.
In summary, while the scars of the 1987 coup remain, the lessons learned and the subsequent adaptations made by the affected communities showcase a testament to human resilience and the potential for healing and growth.
Leave a comment