Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent decision to increase Fiji’s Cabinet to 22 ministers has sparked considerable debate regarding its alignment with the Coalition Agreement established in 2022 among the People’s Alliance, the National Federation Party, and the Social Democratic and Liberal Party, which explicitly stipulates a cap of 20 ministers. Prominent constitutional lawyer Jon Apted has raised concerns that this expansion not only breaches the terms of the agreement but could also jeopardize the stability and collaborative nature of the coalition government.
Apted noted that the agreement is essentially a “gentleman’s agreement” that lacks legal binding. He emphasized the need for mutual respect and cooperation among coalition partners while acknowledging the necessity for flexibility in coalition politics to adapt to changing political dynamics. Those who believe the agreement has been violated may address the issue internally or opt to leave the coalition.
This Cabinet expansion occurs amidst significant challenges in Fiji, particularly within the sugarcane industry, where many growers have indicated they may exit farming within the next five years due to uncertainties. Such socio-economic pressures underscore the growing demands from citizens for enhanced government accountability and effective responses to pressing issues.
Furthermore, the new Cabinet includes independent Members of Parliament who previously belonged to the FijiFirst party, leading to mixed reactions from the public and political analysts. While some argue that a larger Cabinet may foster more effective governance and the ability to tackle crucial issues like climate change and law enforcement, others, including former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, express concern that this expansion could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy without adequately addressing poverty and rising living costs.
As Fiji navigates these turbulent political waters, there is an overwhelming hope that the government can foster a commitment to transparency and community engagement, potentially leading to a more responsive administration focused on the well-being of all citizens. There is an opportunity for the government to realign its objectives, ensuring that it remains sensitive to the needs and aspirations of its populace while rebuilding public trust in its institutions.
In summary, while the recent Cabinet expansion raises significant questions about governance and compliance with political agreements, it also offers a vital opportunity for renewal and positive change within Fiji’s political framework. The hope is that these developments lead to a more united and responsive Fiji, capable of addressing the pressing challenges faced by its diverse population.
Leave a comment