The report regarding the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, will soon be made public, but only after President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu has had the chance to review it, consult with officials, and seek their advice. The President’s Office announced that this process will take additional time due to many officials being on leave during the Christmas and New Year holiday period.
The report was submitted to the President on December 23, 2024. In a recent communication, Mr. Pryde has called for the report to be released to the public, referencing Section 112 (6) of the Constitution, which mandates such transparency. Mr. Pryde has been suspended since April 13, 2023, on allegations of misconduct, specifically for having been seen with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. His suspension followed the protocols outlined in Chapter 5, Part A, Section 112 (4) of the Constitution, leading to the appointment of a three-member Tribunal to investigate the allegations.
Justice Anare Tuilevuka leads the Tribunal, which also includes Justices Chaitanya Lakshman and Samuela Qica. Mr. Pryde has pointed out that the Constitution indicates if the Tribunal finds insufficient evidence to support the allegations, his suspension should be lifted, allowing him to return to his position as DPP and resume his salary and benefits.
He emphasized the urgency of concluding this matter, as it has been almost 21 months since his suspension and nearly six months since his pay was halted, resulting in significant financial challenges for him. Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has refrained from commenting, stating it is not within his jurisdiction, and responses are awaited from the Minister for Justice and the Attorney-General.
The President’s Office has indicated that the review process will be completed after the holiday period, reaffirming the obligation to publicize the report.
This situation underscores the legal mechanisms in place for addressing allegations against judicial officials, and it highlights the importance of due process in ensuring both transparency and fairness. The community looks forward to the resolution of this matter and the restoration of clarity regarding Mr. Pryde’s position and the implications of the Tribunal’s findings.
In a positive light, the eventual release of the report promises to uphold constitutional provisions for transparency, which is vital for fostering trust in the judicial system.
Leave a comment