Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, has publicly stated that he has no intention of resigning or attending the tribunal hearing set for December 2. He argues that his suspension, particularly the halt of his salary, is unfair and has significantly impaired his ability to secure legal representation.
In a letter dated November 21, Mr. Pryde expressed concern over the fairness of the tribunal, stating that it cannot be just when he lacks the necessary resources for adequate defense. He highlighted that the continuation of the hearing under these circumstances violates the tribunal’s commitment to fairness and possibly breaches international labor conventions that Fiji is bound to uphold.
Mr. Pryde has specifically criticized the actions of the Acting Chief Justice and the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) for their roles in suspending his salary. He sees their actions as undermining the tribunal’s integrity and likened it to contempt. He noted that the Prime Minister, Sitiveni Rabuka, has also shown support for his claims regarding the reinstatement of his salary, suggesting a broader recognition of the issue.
Resolutely, Mr. Pryde emphasized that he will not be coerced into resigning, asserting his right to a fair defense. He maintains that he is willing to engage in the tribunal process, contingent upon the restoration of his salary and benefits. Until then, he regrets that he must decline to participate in the hearing.
In a separate comment, the JSC chairperson, Mr. Temo, refrained from discussing the matter in detail due to its pending nature before the tribunal.
This situation highlights significant concerns about the balance between legal proceedings and the rights of individuals involved. It serves as a reminder of the importance of ensuring fair treatment in judicial processes, which is crucial for upholding justice in any society.
Moreover, the support from public figures such as the Prime Minister indicates that Mr. Pryde’s situation resonates beyond just legal circles, potentially leading to a re-evaluation of practices concerning the treatment of suspended officials. The hope remains that a resolution can be reached that respects both justice and fairness, allowing all involved parties their rightful opportunity to defend and represent themselves fully.
Leave a comment