Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, has declared his intention not to resign or attend the tribunal scheduled for December 2. He argues that his suspension from receiving salaries is unjust and has impeded his ability to secure adequate legal representation.
In a statement regarding the tribunal’s communication dated November 21, Pryde expressed his concerns over the fairness of the proceedings, questioning how a hearing can maintain just principles when he lacks the means to defend himself properly. He labeled the continuation of the hearing under these conditions as a violation of the President’s directive for justice and fairness, as well as an infringement of International Labour Organisation conventions that Fiji adheres to.
Pryde criticized the Acting Chief Justice, Salesi Temo, and the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) for supporting his salary suspension in July, suggesting that their actions constitute an interference in tribunal processes and a form of contempt. He noted that Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka publicly backed his call for salary reinstatement, suggesting this support might reinforce the perception of injustice he faces.
Firmly standing his ground, Pryde reiterated that he will not be coerced into resigning and will not participate in the tribunal proceedings without the ability to defend his rights adequately. He stated that reinstating his salary and other entitlements would enable him to re-engage with his legal representation and proceed with the tribunal matters.
In an update regarding the tribunal, Chairperson Salesi Temo indicated that proceedings would commence in December, but refrained from making additional comments due to the ongoing tribunal process.
This situation underscores the broader implications of the judiciary’s independence and the importance of legal representation in maintaining fair judicial processes. It highlights the challenges faced by individuals in similar circumstances and the significance of advocating for one’s rights to ensure equitable treatment under the law.
In summary, Pryde’s determination to uphold his right to a fair hearing is a reminder of the critical balance between authority and justice, raising pertinent questions about due process within the legal system. His resilience in the face of adversity could inspire others facing injustices to stand firm in their beliefs.
Leave a comment