Shadow Minister for Justice, Ketan Lal, has called on the Prime Minister to ensure accountability for the Coalition Government’s consistent breaches of the 2013 Constitution. He voiced his deep concern regarding the recent decision made by Minister for Justice, Siromi Turaga, to place the Commissioner of Corrections, Dr. Nakarawa, on leave. Lal criticized this move as both procedurally dubious and an inappropriate exercise of ministerial power.
According to Lal, the role of the Commissioner of Corrections is one established by the Constitution and appointed by the President, making it independent of a minister’s direct influence in employment matters. He highlighted that Section 137(4) of the Constitution empowers the President, based on the advice of the Constitutional Offices Commission, to suspend the Commissioner and others appointed under similar provisions.
Lal emphasized that Minister Turaga overstepped by acting without consulting the Constitutional Offices Commission. This abrupt decision raises concerns about transparency and could erode public confidence in government institutions. The absence of clarity regarding the allegations against Dr. Nakarawa further complicates matters, with Lal urging the government to follow lawful procedures in addressing any issues related to the Fiji Corrections Service.
Additionally, Lal raised alarm over Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s purported endorsement of this decision, stressing that both Turaga and Rabuka must recognize their limitations concerning such authority. He warned that this misuse of power jeopardizes good governance and creates a perilous precedent regarding political interference in agencies meant to operate independently.
Dr. Nakarawa has reportedly not received any formal notification of the allegations against him and has publicly challenged the legitimacy of this leave. Lal pointed out a concerning trend within the Coalition Government, citing the earlier dismissal of the Director of Public Prosecutions, which implies a pattern of undermining officials appointed under the Constitution.
He questioned whether this target was driven by the government’s discomfort with officials who act independently and resist political pressure. Lal demanded that PM Rabuka not dismiss these violations of the rule of law as mere oversights but instead provide clarity and accountability to the Fijian people.
As the Opposition, Lal conveyed a commitment to holding the current administration accountable, affirming the significance of upholding the independence of key institutions. He underscored that the health of Fiji’s democracy relies on leaders adhering to constitutional limits and respecting the rule of law, echoing the responsibility owed to the electorate.
In summary, this situation emphasizes the critical need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to constitutional mandates within the government, vital for preserving public trust and institutional integrity in Fiji. It is hopeful that constructive dialogue and adherence to legal frameworks can foster stronger governance and democracy in the future.
Leave a comment