Transparency International Papua New Guinea (TIPNG) is sounding the alarm about the possibility of another electoral disaster in the upcoming 2027 elections. The organization’s concerns stem from ongoing issues regarding the electoral process, highlighted by the calamities observed during the 2022 elections and previous polls.

TIPNG has monitored the electoral landscape for over 20 years and has pointed out that the management and execution of elections have consistently shown significant flaws. The watchdog cites the chaotic nature of the 2022 elections, which were marred by severe violence and disruptions—a situation some have described as the worst in the nation’s electoral history.

The group identified major failings at every stage of the election process, including preparation, execution, and results declaration. Among the critical issues were inaccuracies in the electoral roll, inadequate enforcement of election laws, reluctance to adhere to constitutional mandates, disruptions during ballot counting, tumultuous declarations of certain seats, and widespread violence fueled by the proliferation of firearms.

A Special Parliamentary Committee, established shortly after the 2022 elections, proposed 70 recommendations aimed at rectifying these electoral shortcomings. However, a year later, those recommendations have yet to be debated in parliament.

Peter Aitsi, Chair of TIPNG, expressed urgent concern, stating that a five-year electoral planning cycle requires consistent support every year. He emphasized that last-minute fixes would not address the deep-rooted issues present in past elections, urging for proactive measures to sustain democracy in the lead-up to the 2027 elections. Aitsi questioned what actions the Electoral Commissioner and the government plan to take in light of these repeated failures.

In addition to their appeals for systemic change, TIPNG criticized the government for its lack of funding to the Electoral Commission. The 2025 budget did not increase financial allocations, further threatening the Commission’s ability to prepare effectively for non-election years—essential groundwork for upcoming elections.

In conclusion, while the concerns raised by TIPNG are serious, they also provide an opportunity for reflection and action from both government officials and citizens. Addressing these electoral challenges head-on could pave the way for a more credible and peaceful electoral process in the future. Hope remains that with appropriate action and renewed commitment to reform, Papua New Guinea can strengthen its democratic foundation and ensure a fair electoral process in 2027.