Pardon or Commutation? The Controversy Surrounding George Speight’s Release

Justice Minister Siromi Turaga has clarified that George Speight’s death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment in 2002, and this action should not be confused with a pardon. Turaga’s comments come in response to growing public criticism regarding the legality of Speight’s recent presidential pardon.

In addressing the concerns, Turaga emphasized that while the commutation reduced Speight’s sentence, it did not eliminate his conviction or exonerate him from the crime. He explained that amendments in the law, particularly regarding the death penalty, applied universally to all individuals facing capital punishment at that time.

“The change in the law was enacted due to our constitution’s prohibition of the death penalty by hanging, as well as in compliance with international conventions, affecting everyone sentenced to death,” Turaga stated.

Following last week’s announcement of Speight’s presidential pardon, Turaga asserted that due process has been adhered to regarding Speight’s release, noting that other individuals with prior convictions were also released early under the previous government. He expressed that there is now a clearer process for mercy.

Turaga remarked that Speight is deserving of the pardon, asserting, “It is not a question of legality; he deserves it like everyone else.”

Ratu Viliame Seruvakula, Chair of the Great Council of Chiefs, encouraged the public to accept the release of the coup leader, emphasizing that he has served sufficient time. He referenced Nelson Mandela’s philosophy on forgiveness and moving forward, suggesting that dwelling on past grievances can hinder personal freedom.

Speight was one of seven individuals granted pardons and discharged last week, which included Shane Stevens, a significant participant in the 2000 mutiny at Queen Elizabeth Barracks.

Popular Categories

Latest News

Search the website