Opposition MP Sanjay Kirpal has announced his decision to oppose the Constitution (Amendment) Bill proposed by the Coalition Government, emphasizing that any constitutional changes must reflect the rights and voices of the people. Kirpal conveyed his concerns in a recent interview, where he described the intentions behind the Bill as undermining essential principles that protect citizens’ rights and freedoms.
He insisted that the Constitution should serve as the foundation of democracy, protecting citizen rights. Kirpal argued that the proposed amendments lacked a comprehensive and transparent process, critical for representing the public’s best interests. He expressed particular concern that reducing the parliamentary threshold for constitutional changes from 75% to a two-thirds majority, along with the removal of the requirement for a referendum, could silence public voices in significant constitutional matters. This change, he noted, risks eroding public trust and could discourage investor confidence, potentially leading to economic instability.
Additionally, the Opposition MP stressed the necessity of transparency and accountability in governmental processes, advocating for a thorough examination of the proposed Bill. Establishing a clear and open dialogue with the public ensures that any amendments genuinely serve their best interests. Kirpal reiterated the importance of a Constitution that aligns with international standards and reflects a commitment to human rights and democratic principles.
These assertions resonate with concerns raised previously by other opposition MPs, such as Ketan Lal and Rinesh Sharma, who have highlighted the risks of concentrating power away from citizens and the importance of maintaining public engagement throughout the amendment process. Lal warned that amendments could set a dangerous precedent that undermines democratic protections, while Sharma called for a respectful and careful consideration of any changes.
The ongoing debates regarding constitutional reform in Fiji underscore the critical need for inclusivity and transparency in governance. As discussions progress, there is optimism that these dialogues may foster a greater connection between citizens and their representatives, potentially leading to a governance structure that accurately reflects the diverse aspirations of the Fijian people.
This perspective allows for a hopeful outlook, suggesting that continued scrutiny and public involvement may pave the way for constitutional reforms that enhance democratic values and protect the rights of all citizens in Fiji.
Leave a comment