In a recent statement, Inia Seruiratu, the Leader of the Opposition, has criticized Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka for assuming the Minister for Home Affairs role previously held by Pio Tikoduadua. Seruiratu argues that the Prime Minister’s management of the Police portfolio represents a potential conflict of interest. This concern stems from Rabuka’s role as chairperson of the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC), which is responsible for making independent recommendations for the appointment of the Commissioner of Police to President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu.
The position of Commissioner of Police has been vacant for over a year following the suspension and imprisonment of former Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho. Seruiratu emphasized the need for Rabuka to respect the appointment process and consider that as chair, he must not interfere with the commission’s duty. He stressed that the nomination process is ongoing and involves necessary consultations with the responsible minister before the final decision is made by the President.
Other opposition members have expressed similar concerns about what they see as Rabuka taking on too many responsibilities as he also oversees the Department of Immigration. Former Minister Premila Kumar echoed the sentiment that the Prime Minister is wearing “too many hats.”
Responding to these criticisms, Rabuka maintained that holding the Police portfolio does not constitute a direct conflict of interest. He outlined that he would follow the COC’s guidance once their evaluation process is complete, indicating that the consultation process will not undermine the COC’s findings or recommendations.
This situation comes in the wake of Tikoduadua stepping aside to allow for an investigation into passport issuance irregularities linked to allegations of human rights abuses involving the Grace Road Group.
This article reflects significant political developments in Fiji, highlighting the ongoing discussions regarding governmental roles and responsibilities. The dialogue between government officials and opposition members suggests an engaged political environment, with various viewpoints being aired publicly. Such discussions, while sometimes contentious, are essential for maintaining transparency and accountability in governance.
Overall, there is hope that these discussions will lead to a more transparent and balanced process in the appointment of key positions within the government, fostering trust in the mechanisms that govern law enforcement and immigration in Fiji.
Leave a comment