In a recent hearing regarding former parliamentarian Niko Nawaikula’s appeal against the High Court’s decision to dismiss his constitutional redress application, neither Mr. Nawaikula nor any representatives from the Attorney-General’s office or the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) were present before Justice Pita Bulamainaivalu in Suva.
The absence of both parties led Justice Bulamainaivalu to schedule an adjourned hearing for November 29. Earlier this year, Mr. Nawaikula pursued constitutional redress concerning a magistrate he claimed was instructed by the late former Chief Justice Kamal Kumar to escalate his matter to the High Court, which he deemed unfair. Despite his efforts, the application was unsuccessful, resulting in a ruling that required Mr. Nawaikula to pay $2,000 to the Attorney-General’s office, while FICAC was not granted any costs associated with the case. Justice Bulamainaivalu criticized Mr. Nawaikula’s appeal as representing an adequate alternative remedy that constituted an abuse of the court process.
This situation highlights the complexities of legal proceedings and the importance of diligent representation in court. The scheduled adjournment may provide both parties another opportunity to address the issues at hand, potentially leading to a resolution in this ongoing legal matter.
Overall, as the hearing resumes on November 29, there is hope that a clearer path forward will emerge for all involved, reinforcing the significance of legal processes in ensuring justice is served.
Leave a comment