In a recent court session regarding former parliamentarian Niko Nawaikula’s appeal against a High Court decision, neither Nawaikula nor representatives from the Attorney-General’s office or the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) were present. This hearing took place before Justice Pita Bulamainaivalu in Suva, who acknowledged the absence of all parties and consequently scheduled an adjourned hearing.
Earlier this year, Nawaikula sought constitutional redress related to allegations against a magistrate, claiming that a transfer order to the High Court, issued by the late Chief Justice Kamal Kumar, was unjust. However, his application was dismissed, leading to a ruling that mandated Nawaikula to pay $2,000 to the Attorney-General’s office, while FICAC was not awarded any costs due to the circumstances of the case. Justice Bulamainaivalu determined that Nawaikula’s appeal to the Court of Appeal provided sufficient alternative remedies and characterized the constitutional redress action as an abuse of the court process. The case has been rescheduled for November 29.
This situation highlights the complexities and procedural intricacies within the legal system, serving as a reminder of the importance of all parties being present in judicial proceedings. The upcoming adjourned hearing may provide another opportunity for resolution and could potentially lead to a clearer understanding of the legal issues at hand.
In summary, the absence of both parties in Nawaikula’s appeal hearing has led to an adjournment, with significant implications for the legal proceedings moving forward.
Leave a comment