In a notable development from the legal arena, former parliamentarian Niko Nawaikula did not show up for his appeal against the High Court’s decision to dismiss his constitutional redress application. The case was set before Justice Pita Bulamainaivalu in Suva, but neither Nawaikula nor representatives from the Attorney-General’s office or the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) attended the session.
Justice Bulamainaivalu acknowledged the absence of all involved parties and consequently ordered a notice for an adjourned hearing. Earlier this year, Nawaikula sought constitutional redress related to a case directed by the late former Chief Justice Kamal Kumar, where he felt the transfer of the matter to the High Court was unjust. However, his application did not succeed, leading to an order for him to pay $2000 to the Attorney-General’s office, although FICAC was not assigned any costs in this instance.
In his decision, Justice Bulamainaivalu characterized Nawaikula’s appeal to the Court of Appeal as providing adequate alternative remedies to his constitutional claims, describing the process as an abuse of the court system. The case has now been postponed until November 29, allowing for the possibility of a more favorable resolution in the future.
This adjournment may provide Nawaikula an opportunity to regroup and present his arguments with more clarity and conviction. There remains hope that, with proper representation and preparation, the proceedings could pave the way for a more just outcome.
In summary, the case reflects ongoing legal challenges and the complexities of appeals within the judicial system, highlighting the importance of representation and due diligence in legal matters.
Leave a comment