Attorney-General Graham Leung has shed light on the government’s decision regarding the approach to the 2013 Constitution, emphasizing the importance of exploring all constitutional pathways before resorting to the Supreme Court. Leung explained that exhausting these avenues was crucial to substantiate the governance position, particularly after the recent setback with the Constitution Amendment Bill.
“We aimed to go to the Supreme Court only after thoroughly investigating other constitutional options,” he stated. By waiting, the government garnered evidence and experience, enabling them to inform the Supreme Court: “We’ve tried it. It didn’t work. It’s possibly unworkable,” reflecting the challenges faced in amending foundational laws.
Leung acknowledged the disappointment surrounding the failure of the recent Constitution Amendment Bill to achieve a three-quarters majority required for approval at its second reading. He pointed out that this high threshold highlights the inherent difficulties in constitutional amendments, asserting, “Objectively speaking, that requirement is exceptionally difficult.”
Furthermore, he clarified that the discussions concerning the Constitution Amendment Bill were centered on procedural matters rather than content, indicating the government’s commitment to preserving the Constitution’s foundational values. He emphasized an appropriate timing for involving the public to discuss the content changes through the Constitutional Officers’ Commission at a later stage.
This dialogue aligns closely with earlier statements made by Leung regarding constitutional evolution and democratic engagement. He previously noted the necessity of adaptability in governance and the importance of considering societal changes when contemplating constitutional amendments. He reiterated this sentiment, advocating for a participatory process that includes diverse perspectives from the public and civil society in any potential changes to the Constitution.
Leung’s measured approach conveys hope for future constructive amendments and ongoing dialogue, ultimately aiming to create a more democratic framework that resonates with the values and aspirations of the populace. In fostering this collaboration, the government appears poised to navigate the complexities of constitutional reform thoughtfully and inclusively.
Overall, the discussions surrounding the Constitution Amendment Bill reflect an ongoing commitment to engage with the public and re-evaluate governance structures, reinforcing a hopeful vision for a more representative legal framework that serves the needs of all citizens.
Leave a comment