The hearing for three motions brought forth by former supervisor of elections, Mohammed Saneem, began today under Suva Magistrate Yogesh Prasad. The motions challenge the legitimacy of the charges approved by the then-acting Director of Public Prosecutions, John Rabuku. Additionally, Saneem is contesting allegations of violations of fundamental human rights and questioning the powers of the Fijian Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) related to the Electoral Act that enabled them to investigate and prosecute him.
Mr. Saneem faces a charge related to receiving a corrupt benefit, specifically a back payment totaling $55,944.03 from former attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. Notably, prominent Suva attorney Devanesh Sharma represents Saneem, while the state is represented by Acting DPP Nancy Tikoisuva.
The prosecution’s efforts to consolidate charges against Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum will remain on hold until the court resolves Saneem’s issues. The former attorney-general itself is facing separate charges for abuse of office.
Magistrate Prasad indicated that a ruling on these matters will be issued next month, providing a clear timeframe for when the involved parties might expect a decision regarding the validity of the charges.
This legal development reflects a complex intersection of electoral integrity and justice in Fiji, underscoring the importance of due process within the judicial system. Regardless of the outcome, it symbolizes a commitment to uphold democratic principles. The coming month could bring clarity and potentially set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
Leave a comment