The legal representative for Daniel Whippy, the managing director of Carpenters Fiji Limited, has dismissed claims made by the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) lawyer as “hogwash.” This statement was made during a court session where Whippy, who is currently facing charges of abuse of office, sought to modify bail conditions to receive a stem cell treatment for his knee in the United States.
During the proceedings, FICAC lawyer Sera Fatafehi mentioned that the stem cell treatment was available locally, supported by affidavits from a FICAC Investigation Officer and Dr. Alvin De Asa, an orthopedic surgeon at Nasese Private Hospital. Fatafehi contended that these documents presented valid reasons for opposing Whippy’s request to travel for treatment.
In contrast, Whippy’s lawyer, Suruj Sharma, argued against the utility of the local treatment options in the affidavits, noting that they failed to adequately address the specific stem cell procedure. He emphasized the invasive nature of the treatment, stating it could only be conducted in the U.S. and that the FICAC hadn’t provided evidence to counter this.
Fatafehi acknowledged that while she could not confirm the availability of local surgeons for this rare procedure, they had identified a surgeon returning to Suva who would soon provide a statement. Magistrate Sufia Hamza pointed out that a week should have sufficed to file the required affidavits given the surgery’s specific nature. Fatafehi, however, explained that receiving confirmation from a specialist took time due to the rarity of the treatment in Fiji.
Sharma also highlighted Whippy’s ongoing distress, noting that his knee condition impeded daily activities. The court has allowed FICAC an additional seven days to submit relevant affidavits, with the hearing set for November 6. Whippy was excused from the next court session.
In summary, the case illustrates the complexities involved in legal and medical issues, particularly where specialized treatments are concerned. There seems to be a glimmer of hope for Whippy, as further investigations into local options continue, ensuring that he might find necessary care closer to home. It encourages a broader dialogue about healthcare accessibility and the importance of timely legal processes in such critical matters.
Leave a comment