Opposition MP Joseph Nand has voiced concerns regarding the handling of Labour Law Amendments, critiquing the CEO of the Fiji Commerce and Employers Federation (FCEF) for expressing dissatisfaction about the timing of consultations. Speaking to FijiLive, Nand highlighted that this dissatisfaction indicates a failure by the Ministry of Employment to effectively plan and execute these consultations.

Nand asserted that the Ministry needs to acknowledge its oversight, noting that the timing issues during consultations prevented meaningful feedback and submissions from stakeholders, potentially compromising the integrity of the law revisions. He stated, “The understanding on the objective of labor law amendment was to provide a better platform for the labors but surely not at the expense of the employers.” He further emphasized that the revised laws could impose additional burdens on employers, which could ultimately jeopardize workers’ livelihoods if businesses struggle as a result.

Moreover, Nand cautioned that if employers feel pressured by excessive regulations, they might resort to reducing their workforce or cutting hours, adversely affecting the very workers the amendments are meant to help. He criticized the Ministry for proceeding without adequately considering stakeholder submissions and deadlines, suggesting that this indicated a superficial consultation process rather than genuine dialogue.

This reflection echoes previous sentiments expressed by Mahendra Chaudhary, leader of the Fiji Labour Party, who also criticized the government for not addressing concerns raised by both the FCEF and the Fiji Hotel and Tourism Association. Chaudhary emphasized the need for transparency in legislative changes, particularly in light of the harsh penalties proposed, which could significantly impact medium and small enterprises.

As pressure mounts from various business leaders for inclusive dialogue and consideration in the legislative process, the context sets a critical stage for the Ministry of Employment. Stakeholders are hopeful that through continued advocacy and voices raised in opposition, an inclusive and balanced approach can be achieved that benefits both workers and employers alike, promoting economic stability and growth.

In summary, Nand’s critiques and calls for accountability reflect a broader concern over labor law amendments and the necessity for comprehensive and considerate stakeholder engagement in these critical discussions.