Opposition Member of Parliament Premila Kumar has expressed concerns regarding the appointment of John Rabuku as the Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions. Kumar highlighted that Rabuku was previously suspended from practice and fined for professional misconduct by the Independent Legal Services Commission, raising alarms about his suitability for the role.
Kumar noted that the new Attorney General, recognized as the Government’s chief legal advisor, has endorsed this appointment, which was not sanctioned by the Judicial Services Commission or the office of the Attorney General. She argued that this situation prompts serious questions regarding the integrity and trustworthiness of the justice system, implying that standards are being compromised through inadequate vetting of candidates’ past disciplinary records.
She remarked on the potential erosion of public trust in legal and prosecutorial processes due to such appointments. Kumar questioned the thoroughness and transparency of the vetting process for such a crucial position, emphasizing that hiring someone with a controversial past sends a detrimental message about the prioritization of ethical standards within legal institutions.
Kumar further expressed concern about the ability of the public to uphold the rule of law when those responsible for enforcing it have not met ethical expectations. She speculated whether the appointment reflected connections and loyalties, suggesting it might be a reward to the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions, who was previously promoted by Rabuku.
She posed a critical question about the disparity in standards, pointing out that anyone seeking a civil service position typically must undergo rigorous police clearance and character checks, which she feels were overlooked in this instance. Kumar concluded that the implications of this appointment could significantly impact the future of the justice system, underscoring the need for a thorough examination to preserve public confidence in the system.