Siromi Turaga, the Minister for Justice and former Attorney-General, testified today at the special tribunal hearing regarding the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, in Suva. Turaga, who is a complainant in this case, criticized a lengthy conversation that took place between Pryde and former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, describing it as unethical and unbecoming given the context of an ongoing investigation involving Sayed-Khaiyum.
The tribunal is actively examining allegations of misconduct against Pryde, with the aim of advising the President on whether he should be removed from his position as DPP. Key points raised during the hearing include a conversation between Pryde and Sayed-Khaiyum that lasted over 45 minutes on February 28, 2023, while Sayed-Khaiyum was under investigation. Additionally, it was noted that Pryde was receiving $1,000 a month in superannuation without the necessary approvals from relevant government entities.
During his testimony, Turaga detailed how both men distanced themselves from other attendees at an event at the Japanese Embassy, prompting concerns from several officials present at the time. He indicated that Sayed-Khaiyum appeared to dominate the conversation while Pryde seemed to acquiesce. This prompted Turaga to meet with Pryde the following day, where he found Pryde dismissive of the seriousness of the situation.
Turaga underscored the implications of their interaction given the ongoing investigation into alleged abuses of power, stating that it was inappropriate for them to engage so closely under those circumstances. After summoning Pryde, Turaga reported that Pryde recognized his poor judgment and later submitted a letter of apology. Turaga then filed a formal complaint to the Judicial Services Commission on March 29, 2023, based on Pryde’s letter.
The tribunal hearing continues, with six witnesses expected to be called for questioning tomorrow.
This case highlights the importance of ethical conduct in public office, particularly in the context of ongoing investigations. It serves as a reminder that transparency and accountability must be upheld to maintain public trust in the legal system. The tribunal’s diligent examination of the allegations can lead to greater integrity within public service, ultimately fostering a more accountable governance framework.
Leave a comment