The Commission of Inquiry (COI) examining the appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is seeking an extension of its hearings until the end of February, due to a significant amount of evidence that still needs to be reviewed. With only seven out of the 35 witnesses summoned having provided their testimonies thus far, the COI emphasizes the need for thorough and comprehensive questioning to ensure a complete investigation.

Justice David Ashton-Lewis, presiding over the inquiry, stated that while the COI is supposed to submit its final report to President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu at the end of January, the complexity of the case necessitates an extension. He noted, “We have gone through seven; we still have 28 to go,” indicating the considerable workload ahead and the vital importance of receiving detailed responses to thoroughly understand the implications surrounding Malimali’s appointment last September.

The inquiry seeks to ascertain whether Malimali’s appointment adhered to legal standards and to investigate if there was any undue influence from vested interests, particularly pertaining to ongoing FICAC cases involving high-profile public officials. Counsel Assistant Janet Mason reinforced that this investigation is not just about individual conduct but also about the integrity of the institutions involved, including the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) and the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC).

The commission’s slow progress in hearings is viewed positively as a commitment to transparency and accountability. It aims to foster trust in governmental processes by ensuring that all witness testimonies are gathered and assessed thoroughly. So far, witnesses have provided factual and unbiased accounts, reinforcing the professionalism of those involved.

If granted, the extension will not only allow the COI to conduct a more meticulous examination of the remaining testimonies but also reflects a broader commitment to enhancing the integrity of public services in Fiji. This ongoing inquiry represents a significant step toward strengthening public trust and could pave the way for meaningful reforms in governance.

In summary, while challenges arise due to the complexity of the case, the COI’s pursuit of thoroughness and detail in its investigations is commendable. The potential for an extension signals hope for greater transparency and accountability within Fiji’s governance, ultimately contributing to a culture of integrity and respect for the rule of law in public office.