Justice David Ashton-Lewis, who leads the Commission of Inquiry (COI) regarding the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), has emphasized that it is too early to conclude any wrongdoing related to the involved bodies. He noted that a thorough evaluation of evidence is essential before drawing any definitive conclusions. Justice Ashton-Lewis stated, “What looks to be quite innocent in the beginning can change when you get all the evidence,” highlighting the complexities involved in legal scrutiny.

Counsel Assistant Janet Mason reinforced his point by indicating that making premature judgments would be biased and unwise. The inquiry aims to assess the integrity of state institutions, particularly in light of longstanding allegations of political interference that have been directed at FICAC. As part of the ongoing investigation, the commission is exploring whether Malimali’s appointment in September 2024 complied with legal protocols and whether it was influenced by any improper or unlawful factors.

Currently, the COI has heard testimony from seven out of the 35 expected witnesses. Those testifying include notable figures such as the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions and former government ministers. This inquiry is seen as a vital step towards enhancing accountability and transparency in Fiji’s governance, reflecting a commitment to uphold ethical practices in public service appointments.

Furthermore, this investigation serves as a significant opportunity to address public concerns regarding the integrity of governmental processes, particularly the compositional dynamics surrounding FICAC and its operations. As the inquiry proceeds, there is hope that the findings will lead to necessary reforms that could restore public trust and promote a culture of integrity within Fiji’s governance framework.

In summary, the ongoing inquiry is a crucial examination of the legality surrounding Barbara Malimali’s appointment, aiming to ensure that governance practices are transparent and accountable. Moving forward, Fiji looks towards a more robust ethical oversight in its public institutions, paving the way for enhanced trust in its political system.