Justice David Ashton-Lewis, who leads the Commission of Inquiry (COI) into the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), emphasized that it is too early to determine if any misconduct has occurred. He noted the importance of gathering comprehensive evidence before any conclusions can be reached, stating, “What looks to be quite innocent in the beginning can change when you get all the evidence.”

The inquiry is tasked with assessing whether both the Judicial Services Commission and the Constitutional Offices Commission acted within their legal parameters under the 2013 Constitution during Malimali’s appointment in September 2024. Justice Ashton-Lewis mentioned his decision will be guided by the balance of probabilities rather than a criminal standard, allowing for a broader evaluation of the facts at hand.

Counsel Assistant Janet Mason supported Ashton-Lewis’s sentiments, clarifying that the COI must refrain from making premature judgments to avoid any semblance of bias. Mason emphasized that the inquiry aims to uphold the integrity of state institutions, particularly in light of ongoing concerns regarding political interference in FICAC’s operations.

Of the planned 35 witnesses, seven have already provided testimony, with key figures such as the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions and former ministers expected to offer crucial insights in future hearings. The investigation will delve into allegations of improper influences connected to vested interests, particularly those related to ongoing high-profile FICAC cases.

This inquiry marks a significant effort towards enhancing accountability and transparency in governance, reflecting a collective commitment to ethical practices in public service appointments. The final report is scheduled to be presented to the President and Prime Minister by the end of January 2025, suggesting a proactive approach to resolving the concerns surrounding Malimali’s appointment.

As this pivotal inquiry unfolds, it holds the potential to restore public confidence in Fiji’s institutions, showcasing the importance of ethical scrutiny in governance and the value of maintaining integrity within public service roles. The hope is that the outcomes of this investigation will lead to necessary reforms, reinforcing the principles of transparency and accountability in Fiji’s governance framework.

In summary, the ongoing inquiry into Barbara Malimali’s appointment represents an essential opportunity to uphold ethical standards in Fiji’s political landscape, promising a future where public trust in governmental processes can be reinstated.